*****OBBBA is a very comprehensive tax with many changes affecting individuals and
businesses. Each client has different needs and needs various interpretations If desired, we
would be pleased to perform the requisite research and provide you with a detailed written
analysis or meeting. Such an engagement is not part of our tax preparation fees and we
would be happy to quote a fee for this service.****

On July 4, President Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act into law.This followed July 1 passage in the Senate and July 3 passage in the House. Enactment follows days of frantic activity in Congress, with day-long debates, record-setting voting sessions, and many deals to secure passage in the closely divided House and Senate.

COMMENT: One of the final changes to the bill before passage was to strip the name of the Act due to Senate reconciliation rules, so the official name is not the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. This has been done for other recent reconciliation bills, such as the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 and the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.

The Act includes a number of tax changes, including permanent and limited modification of many soon-to-expire tax provisions, new provisions promised by President Trump during his 2024 campaign, elimination or modification of most green energy provisions, and dozens of other changes affecting individuals and businesses. There are many differences outside the tax provisions that have been subject to disagreement within the GOP majority, though the dissenting voices seem to have accepted those changes in order to get the bill across the finish line.

Upon its passage, the majority of the provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) included expiration dates in order to satisfy budgetary requirements. Lower individual rate brackets, higher standard deductions, the elimination of the personal exemption, the cap on the deduction of state and local taxes (SALT), changes to the alternative minimum tax, and many other provisions are all set to expire at the end of 2025. Without legislation, the federal tax system would have largely reverted back to the rules applicable in 2017.

Throughout the 2024 campaign, Trump, as well as many GOP lawmakers, proposed making these soon-to-expire provisions a permanent part of the tax code. The Act does just that, but it comes at a high price tag (some estimates have it at $5 trillion over ten years). Much of this cost is balanced by reduced outlays in many government programs not related to taxation, and by the elimination of many of the "green" tax provisions from the Inflation Reduction Act.

COMMENT: This CCH Tax Briefing is not intended to comprehensively cover all provisions proposed in the approximately 400-page tax portion of the Act, but rather the highlights. See CCH® AnswerConnect for complete coverage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

EXTENDED INDIVIDUAL PROVISIONS

Individual Extenders

Many of the provisions of the TCJA applicable to individuals are among those scheduled to expire at the end of 2025.

These include:

• 10, 12, 22, 24, 32, 35 and 37 percent brackets applicable since 2018;

• Elimination of personal exemptions;

• Increased alternative minimum tax exemption and threshold amounts;

• Lower limitation on the deduction of mortgage interest;

• Limitation on the casualty loss deduction;

• Termination of the miscellaneous itemized deduction; and

• Allowance of rollovers from qualified tuition programs to ABLE accounts.

The Act makes all of these provisions permanent, but does make some modifications. The Act permanently treats mortgage insurance premiums as qualified residence interest for which a deduction could be claimed and allows for unreimbursed educator expenses to be deducted as a miscellaneous itemized deduction. The Act also removes the last seven years of inflation adjustments from the AMT exemption phase-out threshold for joint filers, reverting the threshold to the 2018 amount.

COMMENT: Between 2008 and 2021, mortgage insurance premiums could be treated as qualined residence interest and deducted my homeowners. Also, under current law, teachers are allowed an above-the-line deduction for classroom expenses of up to $300 for 2024 and 2025, but the Act expands that beyond the dollar limitation.

Also, the Act does permanently eliminate the personal exemption amount, but provides a $6,000 deduction amount for seniors age 65 and older after 2024 and before 2029. This deduction would phase out for individuals whose modified adjusted gross income exceeds $75,000 ($150,000 for joint filers).

COMMENT: A similar provision was in the House-passed version of the bill, but was instead an expansion of the standard deduction, and capped at $4,000.

Standard Deduction

The TCJA nearly doubled the standard deduction for tax years beginning after 2017. For 2025 (prior to the Act), the inflation adjusted amounts were $30,000 for joint filers, $22,500 for heads of households, and $15,000 for single taxpayers and married taxpayers filing separately. These higher amounts were set to expire after 2025.

The Act increases the amount of the standard deduction for tax years beginning in 2025 and subject to inflation thereafter. Under the Act, the standard deduction amounts for 2025 are $31,500 for joint filers $23,625 for heads of households, and $15,750 for single taxpayers and married taxpayers filing separately.

COMMENT: In the bill passed by the House, the amounts would have been temporarily increased for tax years 2025 through 2028 by $2,000, $1,500, and $1,000 respectively. The bill originally proposed by the Senate also increased the deduction by the same amounts, but made them permanent and subject to inflation. The lower amounts ultimately passed reflect an attempt to lower the cost of the provision.

SALT Deduction

One of the most controversial provisions of the CJA was the imposition of a $10,000 cap on the deduction for state and local taxes. Before the ink was dry on the 2017 legislation, lawmakers in higher tax states on both sides of the aisle (the so-called "SALT Caucus") were introducing legislation intended to increase or outright repeal the cap.

The Act increases the cap to $40,000 for 2025, with a one percent increase in the cap each year through 2029 before returning to the $10,000 limit in 2030. The cap is reduced by 30% of the amount by which the taxpayer's modified adjusted gross income exceeds a threshold amount. That threshold amount is generally $500,000 for 2025, with a one percent increase each year through 2029.

COMMENT: This had proven to be one of the stickier points for legislators in their negotiations in both the House and Senate. Members of the SALT Caucus were still outwardly unhappy with the $40,000 limit agreed to in the House bill, but ultimately decided to vote in favor of it. The initial Senate proposal made no increase in the cap, but was eventually increased to match the House bill. In the days leading up to passage in the Senate, members of the SALT Caucus have accepted this final framework.

Child Tax Credit

The TCJA increased the amount of the child tax credit from $1,000 to $2,000 for tax years 2018 through 2025, as well as nearly quadrupling the phaseout thresholds to $400,000 for joint filers and $200,000 for other filers.

The Act permanently increases the base amount of the credit to $2,200, subject to annual inflation increases. The post-2017 base amount of the refundable portion of the child tax credit (the "additional child tax credit") remains at $1,400, and continues to be adjusted for inflation ($1,700 for 2025).

The Act requires the taxpayer claiming the credit, the taxpayer's spouse (if married), and the child for whom the credit is claimed to have Social Security numbers.

Estate Taxes

The estate tax basic exclusion amount, which the TCJA doubled for decedents dying through 2025 (inflation adjusted to $13.99 million in 2025) would revert back to 2017 amounts if the TCJA is allowed to expire.

Under the Act, the basic exclusion amount is increased again to a base amount of $15 million for decedents dying in 2026, adjusted for inflation thereafter.

COMMENT: The $15 million amount is probably not far off from where inflation would have taken the exclusion amount for 2026 if the TCJA was not scheduled to expire.

NEW INDIVIDUAL PROVISIONS

No Tax on Tips

One of the big talking points for President Trump during the campaign was the elimination of the tax on tip income. Historically, tip income was not subject to tax until the early 1980s when legislation passed during the Reagan administration treated it like regular income. The deduction is capped at $25,000, and the deduction begins to phase out when the taxpayer's modified adjusted gross income exceeds $150,000 ($300,000 for joint filers). The deduction is not allowed for tax years beginning after 2028. The Act also extends the employer credit for Social Security taxes on employee cash tips to the beauty service industry (the credit currently only applies to the food and beverage industry).

No Tax on Overtime

During his campaign, President Trump also proposed making overtime compensation tax free. Under the Act, taxpayers are able to claim a deduction for the amount of overtime pay received as required under section 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. Like the deduction for tip income, taxpayers do not have to itemize deductions to claim the deduction, but are required to provide a Social Security number. The deduction is capped at $12,500 ($25,000 for joint filers), and the deduction begins to phase out when the taxpayer's modified adjusted gross income exceeds $150,000 ($300,000 for joint filers). The deduction is not allowed for tax years beginning after 2028.

COMMENT: The Act does not provide extensive rules for the application of this provision, leaving the rules of application up to Treasury Regulations.

Social Security Income

During his campaign, President Trump also proposed making Social Security income tax free. However, at no point has the Senate bill, nor the version that passed the House, included a provision to eliminate the tax on or provide a deduction for Social Security income.

COMMENT: It is possible that the special personal exemption available for seniors is intended to accomplish the same goal as making Social Security income tax-free.

Itemized Deduction Limitation

Prior to the TCJA, the itemized deduction limitation was subject to a phaseout at higher incomes (the "Pease" limitation). The Act includes a return of the limitation on itemized deductions for taxpayers in the 37 percent income tax bracket, effective after 2025.

Automobile Loan Interest

Previously, interest on an individual's automobile loan was treated as nondeductible personal interest. The Act includes a deduction of up to $10,000 for interest paid on an automobile loan in 2025 through 2028 for a car purchased after 2024. The deduction is available for both itemizers and non-itemizers.

Trump Accounts

The Act also includes provisions for the creation of tax-favored accounts for newborn children, called "Trump Accounts." The accounts are seeded with $1,000 for newborn children. From a tax standpoint, they operate under rules similar to those applicable to individual retirement accounts, but are available to children.

Additional Provisions

The Act also includes:

• A tax credit for contributions to scholarship-granting organizations;

• An expansion of 529 programs to include elementary, secondary, and home schooling expenses; and

• The resurrection of the COVID-era allowance of a charitable contribution deduction for non-itemizers.

BUSINESS PROVISIONS

Bonus Depreciation

The TCJA provided for 100 percent expensing of certain business property through 2022, with a 20 percent stepdown each year after before reaching 0 percent in 2027 (currently set at 40% in 2025). The Act makes 100 percent bonus depreciation permanent for property acquired after January 19, 2025.

Research and Experimental Expenditures

Under prior law, taxpayers are required to amortize research and experimental expenditures. Prior to 2022, a direct expense election was available. The Act permanently reinstates the deduction for domestic research and experimental expenditure costs incurred after 2024. Taxpayers can elect whether to deduct or amortize the expenditures, though the requirement to amortize under prior law is suspended while the deduction is available. Additionally, small businesses with average annual gross receipts of $31 million or less would be able to elect to claim the deduction retroactively to 2022.

Qualified Business Income Deduction

The TCJA's qualified business income deduction under Code Sec. 199A is set to expire for tax years beginning after 2025.

Under the Act, the qualified business income deduction is made permanent. Additional changes expand qualification for the deduction.

Additional Provisions

The Act also includes:

• An increase in the 179 deduction limitations after 2024

• An exclusion of interest received by qualified lenders secured by rural or agricultural real property

• Modifications to the low-income housing credit.International Extensions

The Act makes permanent many international and foreign-related provisions under the CJA, including the:

• Deduction for foreign-derived intangible income (FDII) and global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI); and

• Base erosion minimum tax amount.

However, the Act changes the FDIl rate to 33.34 percent (currently 37.5 percent) and the GILTI rate to 40 percent (currently 50 percent) after 2025.

COMMENT: Under TCJA, these rates were scheduled to drop to 21.875 percent and 37.5 percent, respectively, after 2025. So this actually represents a tax increase for 2026 and beyond. The Act also changes the base erosion minimum tax amount to 10.5 percent from its current 10 percent rate after 2025.COMMENT. Under TCJA, this rate was scheduled to increase to 12.5 percent after 2025, so this represents a tax decrease for 2026 and beyond. The Act also makes changes to the treatment of "tested" CFC income and the foreign tax credit.

GREEN ENERGY TERMINATIONS

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 created dozens of new tax credits intended to promote the manufacture and adoption of alternative energy sources. The elimination of these credits by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is a key method of paying for many of the new taxpayer-friendly provisions. However, the timing of the termination had been another sticking point throughout negotiations, and as the Senate amended its bill, House leaders were pleading for changes to be included to look more like the House bill.

The major difference between the two chambers largely centered on when credits for "clean" energy producers will be eliminated. The House took the approach that for producers that have already invested in construction costs, the credits should be terminated in 2026 or later.The Senate initially took a much more aggressive approach, with some credits terminating immediately but nearly all terminating before the end of 2025.

Ultimately, the Senate relented and included a longer run-out for energy producers to claim credits, in some cases allowing for construction to begin in 2026.

Where the Senate Act did agree with the House was on the termination of many credits applicable to the consumer side of green energy. Under the Act, the affected credits include the following (termination generally after 2025):

• Previously owned clean vehicle credit;

• Clean vehicle credit;

• Qualified commercial clean vehice credit;

• Alternative fuel refueling property credit;

• Energy efficient home improvement credit;

• Residential clean energy credit; and

• New energy efficient home credit.

IRS PROCEDURAL PROVISIONS

Perhaps the most widely applicable operations provision of the Act is the termination of the IRS Direct File program.

The Act requires the termination of the program within 30 days after passage and appropriates funding for the IRS to research a public-private partnership to replace the current "free file" program.The Act includes specified penalties for fraudulent promoters of retention credit schemes, but at a much lower limit of $1,000 per failure to comply with due diligence requirements (though without a cumulative limit). The Act also includes the termination of the Direct File program.

COMMENT: The version of the bill that was passed by the House included the provision imposing the penalty on ERC promoters with much higher penalty amounts. However, in a subsequent vote on a recissions bill on June 11, a rule adopted in passage struck that provision from the House-passed bill. It isn't clear how that recissions bill will impact this provision.

NEW YORK—The Internal Revenue Service needs to find ways to better communicate how it is handling technology modernization and transformation, including in areas such as the use of artificial intelligence in its processes, agency Office of Internal Consulting Chief Joseph Zeigler said.

NEW YORK—The Internal Revenue Service needs to find ways to better communicate how it is handling technology modernization and transformation, including in areas such as the use of artificial intelligence in its processes, agency Office of Internal Consulting Chief Joseph Zeigler said.

Speaking during a plenary session August 18, 2026, at the IRS Nationwide Tax Forum, Zeigler said it is his “hope that the IRS is going to a better job of telling this story” about how the agency is using technology to help improve its operations and make lives easier for taxpayers and the tax professionals who assist them.

As an example, Zeigler specifically highlighted some of the work the agency is doing with AI.

“When we talk about AI, AI is not meant to replace bodies or people and computers doing the work and there is no human input,” he said. Rather it is about how the IRS “can give our employees tools and resources [and] technology to make them better, more efficient” and improve the quality of their work. “All of those things is what I believe that AI and technology were meant for.”

He continued: “It’s taking our world-class employees and putting them on steroids, giving them the ability to come to the right answer sooner.”

And at the end is the ultimate goal of making the taxpayer experience that much better and more in line with what they expect from their customer interactions with the private sector.

“If we can come to an answer that right the first time, and we can come to it quick, and we can report it to the taxpayer [and say] here’s what’s going on,” he said. “All those things are at our fingertips.”

The IRS issued guidance in the form of sample forms and proposed rollover procedures to simplify, standardize, and expedite the completion of direct rollovers to or from a retirement plan. The guidance is designed to comply with Section 324 of the SECURE 2.0 Act (P.L. 117-328). Use of the sample forms and proposed rollover procedures is optional.

The IRS issued guidance in the form of sample forms and proposed rollover procedures to simplify, standardize, and expedite the completion of direct rollovers to or from a retirement plan. The guidance is designed to comply with Section 324 of the SECURE 2.0 Act (P.L. 117-328). Use of the sample forms and proposed rollover procedures is optional.

The IRS indicates that these sample forms are not inftended to be used for rollovers and transfers between IRAs. According to reports made by the Government Accountability Office and the IRS's conversations with IRA stakeholders, IRA-to-IRA transfers are already completed through an electronic transfer system that is considered uniform and efficient.

The guidance includes:

• (1) a proposed rollover procedure;
• (2) the participant's rollover request form;
• (3) the receiving plan's request to the distributing plan;
• (4) the distributing plan's rollover certification; and
• (5) the receiving plan's rollover acceptance.

The IRS is considering additional guidance to facilitate rollovers. Guidance under consideration includes: (1) eliminating the safe harbor that allows plans to send paper checks to participants to complete a direct rollover; (2) requiring administrators and trustees to complete rollovers via electronic transfers or paper checks sent directly to the receiving plan; and (3) providing for new safe harbors based on the use of sample forms.

Notice 2026-49

IR 2026-91

The IRS and Treasury have announced their intension to propose regulations relevant to Code Sec. 6433 and the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 (P.L. 117-328). For tax years beginning after December 31, 2026, Code Sec. 6433 allows certain low- and moderate-income individual taxpayers who have made qualified retirement savings contributions to receive matching contributions of up to $1,000 as saver’s match contributions.

The IRS and Treasury have announced their intension to propose regulations relevant to Code Sec. 6433 and the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 (P.L. 117-328). For tax years beginning after December 31, 2026, Code Sec. 6433 allows certain low- and moderate-income individual taxpayers who have made qualified retirement savings contributions to receive matching contributions of up to $1,000 as saver’s match contributions.

Background

On April 30, 2026, President Trump issued an executive order to (1) increase public awareness of saver’s match contributions; (2) facilitate participation in eligible retirement savings vehicles; and (3) establish a website that informs about high-quality, low-cost IRAs and taxpayers without an employer-sponsored retirement plan. These taxpayers include independent contractors.

Saver’s Match Contributions vs Saver’s Credit

For tax years beginning after December 31, 2026, Saver’s Match contributions would replace the Saver’s Credit under Code Sec. 25B. This would apply to elective contributions, qualifying retirement plans and IRAs.

However, the Saver’s Credit would continue to be available after December 31, 2026, with respect to contributions made to ABLE accounts under Code Sec. 529A. Saver’s match contributions would be claimed on a new (unpublished) Form 8880-A, Saver’s Match for Qualified Retirement Savings Contributions.

Eligibility

Individual taxpayers who make qualified retirement savings contributions could be eligible for a Saver's Match contribution based on those contributions. The contributions to a new or already-existing IRA after the end of a tax year could be made until the tax filing deadline. The contributions should be designated as being made for the prior tax year.

Tax Status

An eligible individual taxpayer’s saver’s match contribution directly paid by the Treasury to a retirement plan is generally treated as an elective deferral made by the individual taxpayer. The contribution is not taken into account for any elective deferral and catch-up limitations that apply to Code Secs. 401(k), 403(b), or governmental 457(b) plans.

Comments Requested

The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments on the issues addressed on or before October 5, 2026. Comments can be submitted electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov.

Notice 2026-48

IR 2026-89

The Treasury Department and IRS have issued initial guidance on the employer credit under Code Sec. 45S for premiums paid on family and medical leave insurance as provided by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) (P.L. 119-21). Beginning in 2026, an employer may elect to determine the credit based on premiums paid or incurred during the tax year with respect to an insurance policy that provide such leave instead of based on wages paid to a qualifying employee during paid family and medical leave. The Treasury intends to issue proposed regulations that include this guidance.

The Treasury Department and IRS have issued initial guidance on the employer credit under Code Sec. 45S for premiums paid on family and medical leave insurance as provided by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) (P.L. 119-21). Beginning in 2026, an employer may elect to determine the credit based on premiums paid or incurred during the tax year with respect to an insurance policy that provide such leave instead of based on wages paid to a qualifying employee during paid family and medical leave. The Treasury intends to issue proposed regulations that include this guidance.

Premium Method for Credit

The credit may be claimed under the premium method beginning in 2026 only to the extent the insurance premium funds a benefit that would be creditable under the wage method. Thus, the premium must be for insurance coverage with respect to leave that is:

• paid family and medical leave as defined under the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), or required by state local law or paid for by a state or local government,
• payable to an individual who is a qualifying employee of the employer at the time the premium is paid or incurred, and
• provides a benefit that would constitute wages to the employee.

In the case of a premium paid or incurred for an insurance policy that provides both creditable coverage and noncreditable coverage, the employer must allocate the premium between the creditable coverage and the noncreditable coverage using any reasonable method. For example, a blended premium would be a premium for coverage that provides both qualifying paid family and medical leave and other types of leave, or coverage for qualifying employees and nonqualifying employees.

An employer may calculate the tax credit using both the wage method with respect to certain leave and the premium method with respect to other leave. However, an employer may not use the wage method to claim a credit for wages paid to the extent that the employer claims a credit using the premium method for creditable coverage that funds such benefits (or vice versa).

Notice 2026-28

IR 2026-86

The IRS updated frequently asked questions (FAQs) for qualified overtime compensation. The FAQs update guidance on (1) the qualified overtime compensation deduction; (2) coverage and exemptions under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA); (3) Form W-2, Form 1099-MISC, and Form 1099-NEC requirements; and more.

The IRS updated frequently asked questions (FAQs) for qualified overtime compensation. The FAQs update guidance on (1) the qualified overtime compensation deduction; (2) coverage and exemptions under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA); (3) Form W-2, Form 1099-MISC, and Form 1099-NEC requirements; and more.

Qualified Overtime Compensation Deduction

The deduction is up to $12,500 of qualified overtime compensation earned for the year per individual tax return. It is $25,000 for joint return. The deduction is reduced if a taxpayer’s modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) for the tax year exceeds $150,000, and $300,000 for joint filers.

Coverage and Exemptions Under FLSA

The IRS noted that overtime under the FLSA must be paid to individual taxpayers who are (1) covered by the FLSA; and (2) not exempt from the FLSA’s overtime requirement. Ineligible taxpayers would not receive qualified overtime compensation regardless of other laws or circumstances. Employees who are exempt from the FLSA’s overtime requirement include teachers, academic administration personnel, employees of certain seasonal amusement or recreational establishments and more.

Employee-owners of businesses are not FLSA overtime-eligible employees. An employee who owns at least a bona fide 20-percent equity interest in the enterprise in which they are employed is ineligible.

Reporting Requirements

Starting in tax year 2026, payors and employers are required to separately report qualified overtime compensation on a Form 1099-MISC, Form 1099-NEC or Form W-2. Independent contractors would only report qualified overtime compensation on a Form 1099- MISC or Form 1099-NEC.

FS-2026-13

IR 2026-88

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the original public meaning of "limited partner" in Code Sec. 1402(a)(13) is a partner who plays no significant role in managing or running a business. The court rejected the "passive investor" rule followed by the IRS and the Tax Court in Soroban Capital Partners LP (Dec. 62,310). The Fifth Circuit also withdrew its prior opinion in Sirius Solutions, L.L.L.P. (this was the prior name of the limited liability limited partnership in this litigation).

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the original public meaning of "limited partner" in Code Sec. 1402(a)(13) is a partner who plays no significant role in managing or running a business. The court rejected the "passive investor" rule followed by the IRS and the Tax Court in Soroban Capital Partners LP (Dec. 62,310). The Fifth Circuit also withdrew its prior opinion in Sirius Solutions, L.L.L.P. (this was the prior name of the limited liability limited partnership in this litigation).

Background

A limited liability limited partnership operated a business consulting firm, and was owned by several limited partners and one general partner. For the tax years at issue, the limited partnership allocated all of its ordinary business income to its limited partners. Based on the limited partnership tax exception in Code Sec. 1402(a)(13), the limited partnership excluded the limited partners’ distributive shares of partnership income or loss from its calculation of net earnings from self-employment during those years, and reported zero net earnings from self-employment.

The IRS adjusted the limited partnership's net earnings from self-employment, and determined that the distributive share exception in Code Sec. 1402(a)(13) did not apply because none of the limited partnership’s limited partners counted as "limited partners" for purposes of the statutory exception. The Tax Court upheld the adjustments, stating it was bound by Soroban.

Limited Partners and Self Employment Tax

Code Sec. 1402(a)(13) excludes from a partnership's calculation of net earnings from self-employment the distributive share of any item of income or loss of a limited partner, as such, other than guaranteed payments in Code Sec. 707(c) to that partner for services actually rendered to or on behalf of the partnership to the extent that those payments are established to be in the nature of remuneration for those services.

In Soroban, the Tax Court determined that Congress had enacted Code Sec. 1402(a)(13) to exclude earnings from a mere investment, and intended for the phrase "limited partners, as such" to refer to passive investors. Thus, the Tax Court there held that the limited partner exception of Code Sec. 1402(a)(13) did not apply to a partner who is limited in name only, and that determining whether a partner is a limited partner in name only required an inquiry into the limited partner's functions and roles.

No Significant Role in Management

The Fifth Circuit stated that the backdrop against which Congress enacted Code Sec. 1402(a)(13) in 1977 suggested that some participation is allowed, so long as the partners do not exercise control over the business, and that the plain text of the statute points towards this conclusion. The court observed that all relevant sources suggested that when the statute was enacted, the ordinary public meaning of"limited partner" included a partner who did not play a significant role in managing or running the business.

The Fifth Circuit rejected the Tax Court’s Soroban decision, which held that that the term "limited partner" could refer only to passive investors. The court stated that the Tax Court had selected a rule that was divorced from statutory text and that appeared to prohibit even the most minor involvement in corporate affairs. In the Fifth Circuit's view, it would have been understood at the time Congress enacted Code Sec. 1402(a)(13) that a limited partner could not manage the partnership, but perhaps could participate in certain nonmanagerial aspects of the business.

The court also stated that the Soroban decision could not be squared with decades of IRS-approved guidance insisting that what mattered was limited liability alone. The court characterized the IRS's position to be that it could change the meaning of "limited partner" from "limited liability alone" to the "passive investor" standard with no action from Congress to amend the text of Code Sec. 1402(a)(13). Even assuming that the IRS could unilaterally effectuate such changes through tax instructions, the court stated that the IRS's instructions must comport with the original public meaning of the text enacted by Congress.

Withdrawing Sirius Solutions, L.L.L.P., CA-5, 2026-1 ustc ¶50,109, and vacating and remanding an unreported Tax Court opinion.

K Alain, L.L.L.P., CA-5

The IRS has issued final regulations that clarify when backup withholding applies to payments made in settlement of third party network transactions. The final rules reflect amendments to Code Secs. 6050W and 3406 made by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) (P.L. 119-21), and apply to payments made in calendar years beginning after December 31, 2024.

The IRS has issued final regulations that clarify when backup withholding applies to payments made in settlement of third party network transactions. The final rules reflect amendments to Code Secs. 6050W and 3406 made by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) (P.L. 119-21), and apply to payments made in calendar years beginning after December 31, 2024.

Under the de minimis payment rule of Code Sec. 6050W(e) for information reporting purposes, a third party settlement organization (TPSO) must report payments made in settlement of third party network transactions to a payee only if the payments exceed $20,000 and 200 transactions in a calendar year. The final regulations align the backup withholding obligations under Code Sec. 3406 with this reporting threshold.

A payment will be considered a reportable payment subject to backup withholding only if both the $20,000 and 200 transaction thresholds are exceeded during the calendar year. The amount subject to backup withholding includes the entire amount of the transaction that causes either threshold to be breached, whichever occurs later, and the amount of any subsequent transactions made to the payee during the same calendar year. Further, if the TPSO made payments in settlement of third party network transactions to the payee in the previous calendar year that were reportable payments under the backup withholding rules, the de minimis exception to backup withholding would not to payments made to that payee in the current calendar year.

Participating Payees

In the preamble to the Treasury Decision, the Treasury Department and the IRS used the opportunity to clarify that de minimis TPSO reporting and the backup withholding thresholds apply with respect to each participating payee, as defined by Code Sec. 6050W(d)(1).

T.D. 10053

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has issued a final rule that permanently removes the requirement that U.S. companies and U.S. persons must report beneficial ownership information (BOI) to FinCEN under the Corporate Transparency Act. The final rule adopts, with limited changes, an interim final rule issued on March 26, 2025, that narrowed the BOI reporting requirements.

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has issued a final rule that permanently removes the requirement that U.S. companies and U.S. persons must report beneficial ownership information (BOI) to FinCEN under the Corporate Transparency Act. The final rule adopts, with limited changes, an interim final rule issued on March 26, 2025, that narrowed the BOI reporting requirements.

The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) was enacted in 2021 as part of the broader Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020. Its reporting requirement had been characterized as an important step in the fight against money laundering, financing of terrorism, proliferation financing, serious tax fraud, human and drug trafficking, counterfeiting, piracy, securities fraud, financial fraud, and acts of foreign corruption.

In late 2024 and early 2025, however, several federal district courts preliminarily enjoined FinCEN from implementing and enforcing the reporting rule. The Treasury Department announced in March 2025 that it was suspending enforcement of the CTA and its reporting requirements against U.S. citizens, domestic reporting companies, and their beneficial owners, and issued the interim final rule.

BOI Reporting Exemptions

The final rule:

• adopts exemptions that make the rollback of beneficial ownership reporting by U.S. companies permanent,
• exempts foreign pooled investment vehicles registered in the United States from reporting the BOI of a U.S person in control of the investment vehicle, and
• confirms that FinCEN will delete information about any individual that it reasonably believes is a U.S. person (for example, information that is linked to a U.S. passport or U.S. driver's license).

The final rule also makes substantive changes that expand on the relief in the interim final rule, by:

• exempting foreign companies from the requirement to report U.S. person “company applicants” (i.e., the individuals who helped those foreign companies register to do business in the United States), and
• exempting U.S. persons who have applied for FinCEN Identifiers (FinCEN IDs) from having to update or correct the information they provided to FinCEN when they applied.

Foreign entities that are reporting companies are still required under the final rule to report BOI for foreign individuals.

FinCEN has also issued answers to frequently asked questions on the final rule.

FinCEN Final Rule RIN-1506-AB67

The 2025 cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) that affect pension plan dollar limitations and other retirement-related provisions have been released by the IRS. In general, many of the pension plan limitations will change for 2025 because the increase in the cost-of-living index due to inflation met the statutory thresholds that trigger their adjustment. However, other limitations will remain unchanged.

The IRS reminded individual retirement arrangement (IRA) owners aged 70½ and older that they can make tax-free charitable donations of up to $105,000 in 2024 through qualified charitable distributions (QCDs), up from $100,000 in past years. 

The IRS reminded individual retirement arrangement (IRA) owners aged 70½ and older that they can make tax-free charitable donations of up to $105,000 in 2024 through qualified charitable distributions (QCDs), up from $100,000 in past years. For those aged 73 or older, QCDs also count toward the year's required minimum distribution (RMD). Following are the steps for reporting and documenting QCDs for 2024:

• IRA trustees issue Form 1099-R, Distributions from Pensions, Annuities, Retirement or Profit-Sharing Plans, IRAs, Insurance Contracts, etc., in early 2025 documenting IRA distributions.
• Record the full amount of any IRA distribution on Line 4a of Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, or Form 1040-SR, U.S. Tax Return for Seniors.
• Enter "0" on Line 4b if the entire amount qualifies as a QCD, marking it accordingly.
• Obtain a written acknowledgment from the charity, confirming the contribution date, amount, and that no goods or services were received.

Additionally, to ensure QCDs for 2024 are processed by year-end, IRA owners should contact their trustee soon. Each eligible IRA owner can exclude up to $105,000 in QCDs from taxable income. Married couples, if both meet qualifications and have separate IRAs, can donate up to $210,000 combined. QCDs did not require itemizing deductions. New this year, the QCD limit was subject to annual adjustments based on inflation. For 2025, the limit rises to $108,000.

Further, for more details, see Publication 526, Charitable Contributions, and Publication 590-B, Distributions from Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs).

IR-2024-289

For 2025, the Social Security wage cap will be $176,100, and social security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits will increase by 2.5 percent. These changes reflect cost-of-living adjustments to account for inflation.

For 2025, the Social Security wage cap will be $176,100, and social security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits will increase by 2.5 percent. These changes reflect cost-of-living adjustments to account for inflation.

Wage Cap for Social Security Tax

The Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) tax on wages is 7.65 percent each for the employee and the employer. FICA tax has two components:

• a 6.2 percent social security tax, also known as old age, survivors, and disability insurance (OASDI); and
• a 1.45 percent Medicare tax, also known as hospital insurance (HI).

For self-employed workers, the Self-Employment tax is 15.3 percent, consisting of:

• a 12.4 percent OASDI tax; and
• a 2.9 percent HI tax.

OASDI tax applies only up to a wage base, which includes most wages and self-employment income up to the annual wage cap.

For 2025, the wage base is $176,100. Thus, OASDI tax applies only to the taxpayer’s first $176,100 in wages or net earnings from self-employment. Taxpayers do not pay any OASDI tax on earnings that exceed $176,100.

There is no wage cap for HI tax.

Maximum Social Security Tax for 2025

For workers who earn $176,100 or more in 2025:

• an employee will pay a total of $10,918.20 in social security tax ($176,100 x 6.2 percent);
• the employer will pay the same amount; and
• a self-employed worker will pay a total of $21,836.40 in social security tax ($176,100 x 12.4 percent).

Additional Medicare Tax

Higher-income workers may have to pay an Additional Medicare tax of 0.9 percent. This tax applies to wages and self-employment income that exceed:

• $250,000 for married taxpayers who file a joint return;
• $125,000 for married taxpayers who file separate returns; and
• $200,000 for other taxpayers.

The annual wage cap does not affect the Additional Medicare tax.

Benefit Increase for 2025

Finally, a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) will increase social security and SSI benefits for 2025 by 2.5 percent. The COLA is intended to ensure that inflation does not erode the purchasing power of these benefits.