*****OBBBA is a very comprehensive tax with many changes affecting individuals and
businesses. Each client has different needs and needs various interpretations If desired, we
would be pleased to perform the requisite research and provide you with a detailed written
analysis or meeting. Such an engagement is not part of our tax preparation fees and we
would be happy to quote a fee for this service.****

On July 4, President Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act into law.This followed July 1 passage in the Senate and July 3 passage in the House. Enactment follows days of frantic activity in Congress, with day-long debates, record-setting voting sessions, and many deals to secure passage in the closely divided House and Senate.

COMMENT: One of the final changes to the bill before passage was to strip the name of the Act due to Senate reconciliation rules, so the official name is not the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. This has been done for other recent reconciliation bills, such as the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 and the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.

The Act includes a number of tax changes, including permanent and limited modification of many soon-to-expire tax provisions, new provisions promised by President Trump during his 2024 campaign, elimination or modification of most green energy provisions, and dozens of other changes affecting individuals and businesses. There are many differences outside the tax provisions that have been subject to disagreement within the GOP majority, though the dissenting voices seem to have accepted those changes in order to get the bill across the finish line.

Upon its passage, the majority of the provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) included expiration dates in order to satisfy budgetary requirements. Lower individual rate brackets, higher standard deductions, the elimination of the personal exemption, the cap on the deduction of state and local taxes (SALT), changes to the alternative minimum tax, and many other provisions are all set to expire at the end of 2025. Without legislation, the federal tax system would have largely reverted back to the rules applicable in 2017.

Throughout the 2024 campaign, Trump, as well as many GOP lawmakers, proposed making these soon-to-expire provisions a permanent part of the tax code. The Act does just that, but it comes at a high price tag (some estimates have it at $5 trillion over ten years). Much of this cost is balanced by reduced outlays in many government programs not related to taxation, and by the elimination of many of the "green" tax provisions from the Inflation Reduction Act.

COMMENT: This CCH Tax Briefing is not intended to comprehensively cover all provisions proposed in the approximately 400-page tax portion of the Act, but rather the highlights. See CCH® AnswerConnect for complete coverage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

EXTENDED INDIVIDUAL PROVISIONS

Individual Extenders

Many of the provisions of the TCJA applicable to individuals are among those scheduled to expire at the end of 2025.

These include:

• 10, 12, 22, 24, 32, 35 and 37 percent brackets applicable since 2018;

• Elimination of personal exemptions;

• Increased alternative minimum tax exemption and threshold amounts;

• Lower limitation on the deduction of mortgage interest;

• Limitation on the casualty loss deduction;

• Termination of the miscellaneous itemized deduction; and

• Allowance of rollovers from qualified tuition programs to ABLE accounts.

The Act makes all of these provisions permanent, but does make some modifications. The Act permanently treats mortgage insurance premiums as qualified residence interest for which a deduction could be claimed and allows for unreimbursed educator expenses to be deducted as a miscellaneous itemized deduction. The Act also removes the last seven years of inflation adjustments from the AMT exemption phase-out threshold for joint filers, reverting the threshold to the 2018 amount.

COMMENT: Between 2008 and 2021, mortgage insurance premiums could be treated as qualined residence interest and deducted my homeowners. Also, under current law, teachers are allowed an above-the-line deduction for classroom expenses of up to $300 for 2024 and 2025, but the Act expands that beyond the dollar limitation.

Also, the Act does permanently eliminate the personal exemption amount, but provides a $6,000 deduction amount for seniors age 65 and older after 2024 and before 2029. This deduction would phase out for individuals whose modified adjusted gross income exceeds $75,000 ($150,000 for joint filers).

COMMENT: A similar provision was in the House-passed version of the bill, but was instead an expansion of the standard deduction, and capped at $4,000.

Standard Deduction

The TCJA nearly doubled the standard deduction for tax years beginning after 2017. For 2025 (prior to the Act), the inflation adjusted amounts were $30,000 for joint filers, $22,500 for heads of households, and $15,000 for single taxpayers and married taxpayers filing separately. These higher amounts were set to expire after 2025.

The Act increases the amount of the standard deduction for tax years beginning in 2025 and subject to inflation thereafter. Under the Act, the standard deduction amounts for 2025 are $31,500 for joint filers $23,625 for heads of households, and $15,750 for single taxpayers and married taxpayers filing separately.

COMMENT: In the bill passed by the House, the amounts would have been temporarily increased for tax years 2025 through 2028 by $2,000, $1,500, and $1,000 respectively. The bill originally proposed by the Senate also increased the deduction by the same amounts, but made them permanent and subject to inflation. The lower amounts ultimately passed reflect an attempt to lower the cost of the provision.

SALT Deduction

One of the most controversial provisions of the CJA was the imposition of a $10,000 cap on the deduction for state and local taxes. Before the ink was dry on the 2017 legislation, lawmakers in higher tax states on both sides of the aisle (the so-called "SALT Caucus") were introducing legislation intended to increase or outright repeal the cap.

The Act increases the cap to $40,000 for 2025, with a one percent increase in the cap each year through 2029 before returning to the $10,000 limit in 2030. The cap is reduced by 30% of the amount by which the taxpayer's modified adjusted gross income exceeds a threshold amount. That threshold amount is generally $500,000 for 2025, with a one percent increase each year through 2029.

COMMENT: This had proven to be one of the stickier points for legislators in their negotiations in both the House and Senate. Members of the SALT Caucus were still outwardly unhappy with the $40,000 limit agreed to in the House bill, but ultimately decided to vote in favor of it. The initial Senate proposal made no increase in the cap, but was eventually increased to match the House bill. In the days leading up to passage in the Senate, members of the SALT Caucus have accepted this final framework.

Child Tax Credit

The TCJA increased the amount of the child tax credit from $1,000 to $2,000 for tax years 2018 through 2025, as well as nearly quadrupling the phaseout thresholds to $400,000 for joint filers and $200,000 for other filers.

The Act permanently increases the base amount of the credit to $2,200, subject to annual inflation increases. The post-2017 base amount of the refundable portion of the child tax credit (the "additional child tax credit") remains at $1,400, and continues to be adjusted for inflation ($1,700 for 2025).

The Act requires the taxpayer claiming the credit, the taxpayer's spouse (if married), and the child for whom the credit is claimed to have Social Security numbers.

Estate Taxes

The estate tax basic exclusion amount, which the TCJA doubled for decedents dying through 2025 (inflation adjusted to $13.99 million in 2025) would revert back to 2017 amounts if the TCJA is allowed to expire.

Under the Act, the basic exclusion amount is increased again to a base amount of $15 million for decedents dying in 2026, adjusted for inflation thereafter.

COMMENT: The $15 million amount is probably not far off from where inflation would have taken the exclusion amount for 2026 if the TCJA was not scheduled to expire.

NEW INDIVIDUAL PROVISIONS

No Tax on Tips

One of the big talking points for President Trump during the campaign was the elimination of the tax on tip income. Historically, tip income was not subject to tax until the early 1980s when legislation passed during the Reagan administration treated it like regular income. The deduction is capped at $25,000, and the deduction begins to phase out when the taxpayer's modified adjusted gross income exceeds $150,000 ($300,000 for joint filers). The deduction is not allowed for tax years beginning after 2028. The Act also extends the employer credit for Social Security taxes on employee cash tips to the beauty service industry (the credit currently only applies to the food and beverage industry).

No Tax on Overtime

During his campaign, President Trump also proposed making overtime compensation tax free. Under the Act, taxpayers are able to claim a deduction for the amount of overtime pay received as required under section 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. Like the deduction for tip income, taxpayers do not have to itemize deductions to claim the deduction, but are required to provide a Social Security number. The deduction is capped at $12,500 ($25,000 for joint filers), and the deduction begins to phase out when the taxpayer's modified adjusted gross income exceeds $150,000 ($300,000 for joint filers). The deduction is not allowed for tax years beginning after 2028.

COMMENT: The Act does not provide extensive rules for the application of this provision, leaving the rules of application up to Treasury Regulations.

Social Security Income

During his campaign, President Trump also proposed making Social Security income tax free. However, at no point has the Senate bill, nor the version that passed the House, included a provision to eliminate the tax on or provide a deduction for Social Security income.

COMMENT: It is possible that the special personal exemption available for seniors is intended to accomplish the same goal as making Social Security income tax-free.

Itemized Deduction Limitation

Prior to the TCJA, the itemized deduction limitation was subject to a phaseout at higher incomes (the "Pease" limitation). The Act includes a return of the limitation on itemized deductions for taxpayers in the 37 percent income tax bracket, effective after 2025.

Automobile Loan Interest

Previously, interest on an individual's automobile loan was treated as nondeductible personal interest. The Act includes a deduction of up to $10,000 for interest paid on an automobile loan in 2025 through 2028 for a car purchased after 2024. The deduction is available for both itemizers and non-itemizers.

Trump Accounts

The Act also includes provisions for the creation of tax-favored accounts for newborn children, called "Trump Accounts." The accounts are seeded with $1,000 for newborn children. From a tax standpoint, they operate under rules similar to those applicable to individual retirement accounts, but are available to children.

Additional Provisions

The Act also includes:

• A tax credit for contributions to scholarship-granting organizations;

• An expansion of 529 programs to include elementary, secondary, and home schooling expenses; and

• The resurrection of the COVID-era allowance of a charitable contribution deduction for non-itemizers.

BUSINESS PROVISIONS

Bonus Depreciation

The TCJA provided for 100 percent expensing of certain business property through 2022, with a 20 percent stepdown each year after before reaching 0 percent in 2027 (currently set at 40% in 2025). The Act makes 100 percent bonus depreciation permanent for property acquired after January 19, 2025.

Research and Experimental Expenditures

Under prior law, taxpayers are required to amortize research and experimental expenditures. Prior to 2022, a direct expense election was available. The Act permanently reinstates the deduction for domestic research and experimental expenditure costs incurred after 2024. Taxpayers can elect whether to deduct or amortize the expenditures, though the requirement to amortize under prior law is suspended while the deduction is available. Additionally, small businesses with average annual gross receipts of $31 million or less would be able to elect to claim the deduction retroactively to 2022.

Qualified Business Income Deduction

The TCJA's qualified business income deduction under Code Sec. 199A is set to expire for tax years beginning after 2025.

Under the Act, the qualified business income deduction is made permanent. Additional changes expand qualification for the deduction.

Additional Provisions

The Act also includes:

• An increase in the 179 deduction limitations after 2024

• An exclusion of interest received by qualified lenders secured by rural or agricultural real property

• Modifications to the low-income housing credit.International Extensions

The Act makes permanent many international and foreign-related provisions under the CJA, including the:

• Deduction for foreign-derived intangible income (FDII) and global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI); and

• Base erosion minimum tax amount.

However, the Act changes the FDIl rate to 33.34 percent (currently 37.5 percent) and the GILTI rate to 40 percent (currently 50 percent) after 2025.

COMMENT: Under TCJA, these rates were scheduled to drop to 21.875 percent and 37.5 percent, respectively, after 2025. So this actually represents a tax increase for 2026 and beyond. The Act also changes the base erosion minimum tax amount to 10.5 percent from its current 10 percent rate after 2025.COMMENT. Under TCJA, this rate was scheduled to increase to 12.5 percent after 2025, so this represents a tax decrease for 2026 and beyond. The Act also makes changes to the treatment of "tested" CFC income and the foreign tax credit.

GREEN ENERGY TERMINATIONS

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 created dozens of new tax credits intended to promote the manufacture and adoption of alternative energy sources. The elimination of these credits by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is a key method of paying for many of the new taxpayer-friendly provisions. However, the timing of the termination had been another sticking point throughout negotiations, and as the Senate amended its bill, House leaders were pleading for changes to be included to look more like the House bill.

The major difference between the two chambers largely centered on when credits for "clean" energy producers will be eliminated. The House took the approach that for producers that have already invested in construction costs, the credits should be terminated in 2026 or later.The Senate initially took a much more aggressive approach, with some credits terminating immediately but nearly all terminating before the end of 2025.

Ultimately, the Senate relented and included a longer run-out for energy producers to claim credits, in some cases allowing for construction to begin in 2026.

Where the Senate Act did agree with the House was on the termination of many credits applicable to the consumer side of green energy. Under the Act, the affected credits include the following (termination generally after 2025):

• Previously owned clean vehicle credit;

• Clean vehicle credit;

• Qualified commercial clean vehice credit;

• Alternative fuel refueling property credit;

• Energy efficient home improvement credit;

• Residential clean energy credit; and

• New energy efficient home credit.

IRS PROCEDURAL PROVISIONS

Perhaps the most widely applicable operations provision of the Act is the termination of the IRS Direct File program.

The Act requires the termination of the program within 30 days after passage and appropriates funding for the IRS to research a public-private partnership to replace the current "free file" program.The Act includes specified penalties for fraudulent promoters of retention credit schemes, but at a much lower limit of $1,000 per failure to comply with due diligence requirements (though without a cumulative limit). The Act also includes the termination of the Direct File program.

COMMENT: The version of the bill that was passed by the House included the provision imposing the penalty on ERC promoters with much higher penalty amounts. However, in a subsequent vote on a recissions bill on June 11, a rule adopted in passage struck that provision from the House-passed bill. It isn't clear how that recissions bill will impact this provision.

The IRS has issued final regulations modifying reporting obligations for partnerships involved in Code Sec. 751(a) exchanges of partnership interests. The regulations remove the requirement that partnerships furnish transferors with certain information relating to unrealized receivables and inventory items by January 31 following the exchange year. The regulations are effective for returns filed for tax years ending on or after May 20, 2026.

The IRS has issued final regulations modifying reporting obligations for partnerships involved in Code Sec. 751(a) exchanges of partnership interests. The regulations remove the requirement that partnerships furnish transferors with certain information relating to unrealized receivables and inventory items by January 31 following the exchange year. The regulations are effective for returns filed for tax years ending on or after May 20, 2026.

Under Code Sec. 6050K, partnerships must file Form 8308, Report of a Sale or Exchange of Certain Partnership Interests, for transfers involving Code Sec. 751(a) property. The IRS and Treasury Department received comments that many partnerships could not determine the information required for Part IV of Form 8308 by the January 31 furnishing deadline. As a result, the final regulations remove Reg. §1.6050K-1(c)(2) and revise Reg. §1.6050K-1(c)(1) to permit partnerships to furnish Form 8308 completed in accordance with the form instructions.

Although partnerships are no longer required to furnish Part IV information to transferors and transferees by January 31, they must still file a completed Form 8308, including Part IV, with Form 1065. The IRS finalized the regulations without substantive changes from the proposed regulations issued in 2025.

T.D. 10048

The IRS has issued guidance on qualified long-term care distributions from qualified retirement plans. The guidance affects providers of certified long-term care insurance (issuers), plan administrators, and individual participants receiving qualified long-term care distributions. The IRS also extended the general deadline for amending a plan to permit qualified long-term care distributions to December 31, 2027.

The IRS has issued guidance on qualified long-term care distributions from qualified retirement plans. The guidance affects providers of certified long-term care insurance (issuers), plan administrators, and individual participants receiving qualified long-term care distributions. The IRS also extended the general deadline for amending a plan to permit qualified long-term care distributions to December 31, 2027.

Background

The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 (SECURE 2.0 Act), permitted defined contribution plans to make qualified long-term care distributions, effective for distributions made after December 29, 2025. The 10 percent additional tax on early distributions would not apply to distributions under Code Sec. 401(a)(39). However, a qualified long-term care distribution would be included in the taxpayer’s gross income.

Disclosure Requirements

The guidance addresses content requirements and procedures for submitting an Issuer Disclosure to the IRS. There is no general deadline for submitting an Issuer Disclosure. However, an issuer must submit an Issuer Disclosure to the IRS before the issuer can file a long-term care premium statement with a defined contribution plan.

Distribution Requirements

Under the guidance, the plan administrator is permitted to rely on the issuer’s statement and the information provided on the long-term care premium statement in making a qualified long-term care distribution. It is optional for a plan to permit qualified long-term care distributions, but the exception to the 10% additional tax only applies if the plan permits qualified long-term care distributions, even if the employee uses a distribution to pay for long-term care insurance. Unlike other permitted distributions, a qualified long-term care distribution would not be eligible for an extended 3-year repayment to a retirement plan.

Reporting Requirements

The payment of a qualified long-term care distribution to an employee must be reported by the payor on Form 1099-R, Distributions from Pensions, Annuities, Retirement or Profit Sharing Plans, IRAs, Insurance Contracts, etc.

Further, issuers must make a return to the IRS using Form 1099-LPS, Long-Term Care Premiums Paid Statement. The issuer will report the long-term care premiums paid for the calendar year. The Form 1099-LPS must be filed with the IRS no later than February 1 of the calendar year following the calendar year the long-term care premium statement was filed with the plan.

Deadline Extension

The guidance extends the deadline for a plan sponsor of a defined contribution plan that is not a governmental plan, a section 403(b) plan maintained by a public school, or an applicable collectively bargained plan, to amend its plan to permit qualified long-term care distributions from December 31, 2026, to December 31, 2027. The deadlines to amend defined contribution plans that are applicable collectively bargained plans or governmental plans remain as provided in Notice 2024-02. Thus, Notice 2024-2, I.R.B. 2024-2, 316, is modified in part.

Notice 2026-33

The IRS finalized regulations treating income derived by individual members of an Indian tribe from fishing rights-related activities as compensation for purposes of limitations on benefits and contributions under a qualified retirement plan. These regulations are effective for plan years beginning on or after May 4, 2026, and affect participants, beneficiaries, sponsors, and administrators of Tribal plans.

The IRS finalized regulations treating income derived by individual members of an Indian tribe from fishing rights-related activities as compensation for purposes of limitations on benefits and contributions under a qualified retirement plan. These regulations are effective for plan years beginning on or after May 4, 2026, and affect participants, beneficiaries, sponsors, and administrators of Tribal plans.

Fishing rights-related income is exempt from federal income tax and employment tax under Code Sec. 7873. However, proposed reliance regulations would allow contributions to be made to qualified retirement plans based on fishing rights-related income. Also, plans that accept contributions of fishing rights-related income may still use safe harbor definitions of compensation. The IRS finalized this rule as proposed without material modification.

Although the final rule is somewhat limited in scope, the IRS addressed additional issues in the preamble. The IRS clarified that plan contributions attributable to a Tribal employee's fishing rights-related activiity is treated as investment in the contract under Code Sec. 72 . Thus, distributions of the amount contributed would generally be tax-free (subject to basis recovery rules) and distributions attributable to earnings would be taxable. The IRS also indicated that plans that permit designated Roth contributions may allow contributions attributable to fishing rights-related activity to be made on a Roth basis.

T.D. 10046

The IRS has introduced a streamlined option allowing taxpayers to extend the time to challenge disallowed Employee Retention Credit (ERC) claims, reducing the need for immediate refund litigation. The measure applies to taxpayers who received Letter 105-C or 106-C, are awaiting review by the IRS Independent Office of Appeals and have six months or less remaining in the statutory two-year period.

The IRS has introduced a streamlined option allowing taxpayers to extend the time to challenge disallowed Employee Retention Credit (ERC) claims, reducing the need for immediate refund litigation. The measure applies to taxpayers who received Letter 105-C or 106-C, are awaiting review by the IRS Independent Office of Appeals and have six months or less remaining in the statutory two-year period.

Taxpayers generally have two years from the disallowance notice to resolve the claim or file a refund suit, but an administrative appeal does not suspend this deadline. Once the period expires, the IRS cannot issue a refund even if the taxpayer later prevails. To address this, eligible taxpayers may execute Form 907, Agreement to Extend the Time to Bring Suit, provided it is signed by both parties before the limitation period ends.

The IRS now permits submission of Form 907 through its Document Upload Tool, with qualifying requests reviewed and confirmed in writing. While the IRS is issuing notices to eligible taxpayers, others meeting the criteria may also apply. The agency indicated that the initiative is intended to preserve taxpayer rights and facilitate administrative resolution of ERC disputes.

The IRS has established a significant issue ruling program for cerain corporate transactions (Rev. Proc. 2026-21). This program would not diminish the availability of letter rulings under existing programs. This procedure modifies and amplifies the ruling procedures provided in Rev. Proc. 2026-1, I.R.B. 2026-1, 1, and Rev. Proc. 2026-3, I.R.B. 2026-1, 143.

The IRS has established a significant issue ruling program for cerain corporate transactions (Rev. Proc. 2026-21). This program would not diminish the availability of letter rulings under existing programs. This procedure modifies and amplifies the ruling procedures provided in Rev. Proc. 2026-1, I.R.B. 2026-1, 1, and Rev. Proc. 2026-3, I.R.B. 2026-1, 143.

The significant issue ruling program allows taxpayers to request rulings on one or more issues that:

• are solely under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate);
• are significant issues, as defined in section 4.02 of Rev. Proc. 2026-21; and
• involve the tax consequences or characterization of a transaction (or part of a transaction) that is described in Code Sec. 332, 351, 355, 368, or 1036.

Significant Issue Ruling Program

Taxpayers may request, and the IRS may issue, a ruling on part of an integrated transaction described in the above provisions, or a ruling on a particular legal issue under a section of the Code or regulations with respect to a transaction (or part thereof) rather than a ruling that addresses all aspects of that section (or any other section) with respect to the transaction (or part thereof).

In addition, the IRS may rule on the tax consequences resulting from integrated transactions described in the above provisions to the extent that a significant issue is presented under related Code sections that address such tax consequences.

A significant issue generally is a germane and specific issue of law, provided that a ruling on the issue would not be a comfort ruling or the conclusion in such a ruling otherwise would not be essentially free from doubt.

The requests for ruling must contain (1) narrative description of the transaction that puts the significant issue in context; (2) statement identifying the issue; (3) analysis of the solvability of issue; and more.

Effect on Other Documents

Rev. Proc. 2026-1 and Rev. Proc. 2026-3 are modified and amplified.

Effective Date

The significant issue ruling program applies to all letter ruling requests described in section 4.01 of Rev. Proc. 2026-21 postmarked or, if not mailed, received by the IRS after May 5, 2026.

Rev. Proc. 2026-21

Other References:

• Code Sec. 332
• CCH Reference - FED ¶16,052.188

Other References:

• Code Sec. 351
• CCH Reference - FED ¶16,405.48

Other References:

• Code Sec. 355
• CCH Reference - FED ¶16,466.923

Other References:

• Code Sec. 368
• CCH Reference - FED ¶16,753.53

Other References:

• Code Sec. 1036
• CCH Reference - FED ¶29,702.11

The IRS has announced a new time-limited settlement opportunity for eligible taxpayers involved in conservation easement and historic preservation easement disputes with the IRS. The program aims to resolve cases faster and on terms that are generally more favorable than recent Tax Court decisions.

The IRS has announced a new time-limited settlement opportunity for eligible taxpayers involved in conservation easement and historic preservation easement disputes with the IRS. The program aims to resolve cases faster and on terms that are generally more favorable than recent Tax Court decisions. Since 2020, the IRS has settled 405 cases through earlier initiatives, although taxpayers still had to pay penalties and were allowed only limited deductions for certain out-of-pocket costs. More than 1,100 conservation easement cases currently remain pending before the IRS and the Tax Court. Under the new initiative, many eligible partnerships will not have to make an upfront payment to participate. In addition, taxpayers whose earlier settlement offers expired or were rejected may now have another chance to resolve their cases, while some partnerships that were not previously eligible may also qualify. IRS Chief Executive Officer Frank J. Bisignano said Congress created the conservation easement deduction to encourage legitimate preservation efforts rather than tax shelters based on inflated property values.

The IRS said partnerships that accept the offer during the initial 90-day period generally will not be allowed a charitable contribution deduction, but they may qualify for a limited deduction tied to certain out-of-pocket expenses. Those partnerships generally would face a 10 percent gross valuation misstatement penalty, while partnerships settling during an additional 45-day period generally would face a 20 percent penalty. Interest also will continue to accrue as required by law. At the same time, the IRS noted that courts have repeatedly reduced claimed deductions and upheld significant penalties in conservation easement disputes. Certain cases, such as those already tried or currently under appeal, will not qualify for the initiative. The IRS added that eligibility will depend on the status and specific facts of each case.

Following a 2026 tax filing season that was consistent with the 2025 season, the American Institute of CPAs offered legislators a series of recommendations to help improve filing season in the future.

Following a 2026 tax filing season that was consistent with the 2025 season, the American Institute of CPAs offered legislators a series of recommendations to help improve filing season in the future.

“Based on limited and anecdotal information, many practitioners noted that the IRS appeared to operating consistently compared with the prior year’s service,” AICPA said in a recent letter to the Senate Finance Committee’s top leadership following a hearing on the 2026 tax filing season, adding that data currently available shows “tax return processing remained relatively consistent, though the quality of telephone services appeared to vary depending on the hotline.”

AICPA did observe that while Internal Revenue Service modernization efforts have allowed for consistent customer service levels compared to recent prior years, “IRS customer service has not returned to pre-COVID-19 pandemic levels according to IRS data and the AICPA’s most recent annual membership survey.”

With that, the industry organization offered recommendations in the areas of governance and oversight, taxpayer services, and dedicated practitioner services.

In the area of IRS governance and oversight, AICPA recommended the following:

• Requiring a Government Accountability Office review to determine whether a private sector board with sufficient authority to hold the IRS accountable and oversee implementation of key recommendations from advisory groups;
• Re-establish the annual joint hearing review to focus on strategic and business plans, taxpayer service and compliance, technology and modernization, and the filing season; and
• The Joint Committee on Taxation should provide a bi-annual report on the overall state of the Federal tax system.

In the area of taxpayer service, the following recommendations were offered:

• Hire more qualified and experienced professionals from the private sector, adequately train all agency employees, skillfully manage IRS resources, and ensure organizational alignment between Congress, the executive branch, and the IRS;
• Congress should determine what the appropriate level of service is and then ensure that the appropriate resources are allocated to achieve that level;
• Continue to improve the technology infrastructure modernization; and
• Effectively utilize customer satisfaction surveys to assess IRS performance, improve the taxpayer experience, and effectuate modernization efforts or process improvement.

AICPA pushed for the passage of the Taxpayer Assistance and Services Act, which it states “would significantly improve IRS services, reinforce fairness and transparency in our tax system, and reduce tax administrative burdens on taxpayers and practitioners, including many critical tax provisions for which AICPA has previously advocated.”

In the area of dedicated practitioner services, AICPA recommended:

• Create consolidated dedicated “executive-level” practitioner services comparable to private sector services that are implemented and adapted based on practitioner feedback solicited periodically; and
• Continue to expand the functionality of a robust and enhanced tax professional account as part of the IRS’s online portal with account access to all of a practitioner’s client information, allowing for IRS to communicate directly with authorized practitioners, enable a centralized login system, and prioritize the protection and privacy of user identities and data;
• Provide practitioners with a robust practitioner priority hotline with high-skilled employees capable of resolving complex technical and procedural issues; and
• Assign customer service representatives to each geographic area to address unusual or complex issues that practitioners were unable to resolve through the priority hotlines.

The letter to the Senate Finance Committee leadership and other AICPA 2026 tax policy and advocacy comment letter can be found here.

The 2025 cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) that affect pension plan dollar limitations and other retirement-related provisions have been released by the IRS. In general, many of the pension plan limitations will change for 2025 because the increase in the cost-of-living index due to inflation met the statutory thresholds that trigger their adjustment. However, other limitations will remain unchanged.

The IRS reminded individual retirement arrangement (IRA) owners aged 70½ and older that they can make tax-free charitable donations of up to $105,000 in 2024 through qualified charitable distributions (QCDs), up from $100,000 in past years. 

The IRS reminded individual retirement arrangement (IRA) owners aged 70½ and older that they can make tax-free charitable donations of up to $105,000 in 2024 through qualified charitable distributions (QCDs), up from $100,000 in past years. For those aged 73 or older, QCDs also count toward the year's required minimum distribution (RMD). Following are the steps for reporting and documenting QCDs for 2024:

• IRA trustees issue Form 1099-R, Distributions from Pensions, Annuities, Retirement or Profit-Sharing Plans, IRAs, Insurance Contracts, etc., in early 2025 documenting IRA distributions.
• Record the full amount of any IRA distribution on Line 4a of Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, or Form 1040-SR, U.S. Tax Return for Seniors.
• Enter "0" on Line 4b if the entire amount qualifies as a QCD, marking it accordingly.
• Obtain a written acknowledgment from the charity, confirming the contribution date, amount, and that no goods or services were received.

Additionally, to ensure QCDs for 2024 are processed by year-end, IRA owners should contact their trustee soon. Each eligible IRA owner can exclude up to $105,000 in QCDs from taxable income. Married couples, if both meet qualifications and have separate IRAs, can donate up to $210,000 combined. QCDs did not require itemizing deductions. New this year, the QCD limit was subject to annual adjustments based on inflation. For 2025, the limit rises to $108,000.

Further, for more details, see Publication 526, Charitable Contributions, and Publication 590-B, Distributions from Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs).

IR-2024-289

For 2025, the Social Security wage cap will be $176,100, and social security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits will increase by 2.5 percent. These changes reflect cost-of-living adjustments to account for inflation.

For 2025, the Social Security wage cap will be $176,100, and social security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits will increase by 2.5 percent. These changes reflect cost-of-living adjustments to account for inflation.

Wage Cap for Social Security Tax

The Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) tax on wages is 7.65 percent each for the employee and the employer. FICA tax has two components:

• a 6.2 percent social security tax, also known as old age, survivors, and disability insurance (OASDI); and
• a 1.45 percent Medicare tax, also known as hospital insurance (HI).

For self-employed workers, the Self-Employment tax is 15.3 percent, consisting of:

• a 12.4 percent OASDI tax; and
• a 2.9 percent HI tax.

OASDI tax applies only up to a wage base, which includes most wages and self-employment income up to the annual wage cap.

For 2025, the wage base is $176,100. Thus, OASDI tax applies only to the taxpayer’s first $176,100 in wages or net earnings from self-employment. Taxpayers do not pay any OASDI tax on earnings that exceed $176,100.

There is no wage cap for HI tax.

Maximum Social Security Tax for 2025

For workers who earn $176,100 or more in 2025:

• an employee will pay a total of $10,918.20 in social security tax ($176,100 x 6.2 percent);
• the employer will pay the same amount; and
• a self-employed worker will pay a total of $21,836.40 in social security tax ($176,100 x 12.4 percent).

Additional Medicare Tax

Higher-income workers may have to pay an Additional Medicare tax of 0.9 percent. This tax applies to wages and self-employment income that exceed:

• $250,000 for married taxpayers who file a joint return;
• $125,000 for married taxpayers who file separate returns; and
• $200,000 for other taxpayers.

The annual wage cap does not affect the Additional Medicare tax.

Benefit Increase for 2025

Finally, a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) will increase social security and SSI benefits for 2025 by 2.5 percent. The COLA is intended to ensure that inflation does not erode the purchasing power of these benefits.